Supreme Court Upholds Arizona’s Ban on Ballot Harvesting

In a 6-3 decision, SCOTUS upheld two key provisions of Arizona’s election integrity laws liberals called “racist.”

The Supreme Court struck down a lower court’s ruling that Arizona’s ban on ballot harvesting violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 on the grounds that it disenfranchised minority voters.

BREAKING NEWS: In 6-3 ruling, SCOTUS upholds two Arizona voting provisions: a ban on so-called "ballot harvesting," and a policy that throws out an entire ballot if it was cast in the wrong precinct. Challengers argued that both provisions discriminate against minority voters.

— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) July 1, 2021

The 6-3 decision was split along ideological lines with Justices Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Alito, and Barrett ruling to uphold Arizona’s election integrity laws. All 3 liberals predictably dissented.

The ruling in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is the latest failed attempt by the left to use race as a political tool to undermine simple rules to protect America’s elections.

The most closely followed element of the case was the ban on ballot harvesting. Conservatives have long decried ballot harvesting as a corrupt practice rife with fraud.

Ballot harvesting = voter fraud.

— Representative Mike Loychik (@MikeLoychik) July 1, 2021

While Democrats are expected to continue pushing the narrative that election security measures are somehow racist, it appears they have a long way to go in actually winning that argument.

Do you agree with SCOTUS’ decision? Should ballot harvesting be banned? Comment your thoughts below!

---